AI Conformity Assessment Standard
Undergo conformity assessment before placing high-risk AI systems on the market.
2
Controls
0
Compliant
1
In Progress
1
Not Started
AI Conformity Assessment Standard
Document Type: Standard
Standard ID: STD-AI-010
Standard Title: AI Conformity Assessment Standard
Version: 1.0
Effective Date: 2025-08-01
Next Review Date: 2026-08-01
Review Frequency: Annually or upon regulatory change
Parent Policy: POL-AI-001 - Artificial Intelligence Policy
Owner: Chief Legal Officer
Approved By: AI Governance Committee Chair
Status: Draft
Classification: Confidential
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Document History
- Objective
- Scope and Applicability
- Control Standard
- Supporting Procedures
- Compliance
- Roles and Responsibilities
- Exceptions
- Enforcement
- Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
- Training Requirements
- Definitions
- Link with AI Act and ISO42001
DOCUMENT HISTORY
| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approval Date | Approved By |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 2025-07-10 | Michael Brown, Chief Legal Officer | Initial draft | - | - |
| 0.2 | 2025-07-25 | Michael Brown, Chief Legal Officer | Added Annex VI/VII details | - | - |
| 0.3 | 2025-08-01 | Michael Brown, Chief Legal Officer | Incorporated stakeholder feedback | - | - |
| 1.0 | 2025-08-01 | Michael Brown, Chief Legal Officer | Final version approved - GRC restructured | 2025-07-25 | Jane Doe, AI Governance Committee Chair |
OBJECTIVE
This standard defines requirements for conducting conformity assessment of high-risk AI systems before market placement, in compliance with EU AI Act Article 43 and Annexes VI & VII.
Primary Goals:
- Conduct internal conformity assessment per Annex VI for Annex III points 2–8 high-risk AI systems (notified body involvement not available for these categories)
- For Annex III point 1 (biometric) systems: select between Annex VI (internal control) and Annex VII (notified body QMS/technical documentation assessment) per Article 43(1); apply Annex VII where harmonised standards are not applied
- Conduct conformity assessment per applicable Union harmonisation legislation for Annex I product safety AI systems, with Annex VII points 4.3–4.6 also applying per Article 43(3)
- Prepare and issue EU Declaration of Conformity per Article 47
- Affix CE marking per Article 48
- Maintain conformity throughout AI system lifecycle
SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY
2.1 Mandatory Applicability
This standard is mandatory for:
- All high-risk AI systems before market placement (EU AI Act Article 43)
- All substantial modifications to high-risk AI systems
- Providers placing high-risk AI systems on EU market
2.2 Conformity Assessment Procedures Covered
Per Article 43, there are three tracks:
- Track 1 — Annex III points 2–8 systems: Annex VI internal control (self-assessment) only. Notified body involvement under Annex VII is not available for these high-risk AI categories (Article 43(2)).
- Track 2 — Annex III point 1 (biometric) systems: Provider may choose Annex VI (internal control) or Annex VII (notified body QMS and technical documentation assessment). Annex VII is mandatory where harmonised standards do not exist, are not applied, or common specifications are not applied (Article 43(1)).
- Track 3 — Annex I product safety systems: Conformity assessment follows the applicable Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I. Annex VII points 4.3–4.6 also apply (Article 43(3)).
- EU Declaration of Conformity (Article 47)
- CE marking (Article 48)
2.3 Out of Scope
- Non-high-risk AI systems (no conformity assessment required)
- Conformity assessment outside EU AI Act scope
CONTROL STANDARD
Control CA-001: Technical Documentation Preparation for Conformity Assessment
Control ID: CA-001
Control Name: Technical Documentation Preparation for Annex VI Assessment
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per high-risk AI system
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Prepare complete technical documentation per Annex IV for Annex VI internal control conformity assessment to ensure all required documentation is available for compliance verification.
Control Requirements
CR-001.1: Technical Documentation Completeness
Prepare complete technical documentation per Annex IV.
Documentation Requirements:
- All Annex IV elements complete
- Technical documentation current
- Documentation reviewed and approved
- Documentation available for authorities
Mandatory Actions:
- Create technical documentation (per STD-AI-004)
- Verify completeness against Annex IV checklist
- Obtain technical review
- Obtain legal review
- Obtain final approval
- Archive documentation
Annex IV Completeness Checklist:
| Annex IV Element | Required | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| System description | YES | ☐ | Technical documentation |
| Intended purpose | YES | ☐ | Technical documentation |
| System architecture | YES | ☐ | Architecture documentation |
| Data governance | YES | ☐ | Data documentation (STD-AI-003) |
| Risk management | YES | ☐ | Risk documentation (STD-AI-002) |
| Human oversight | YES | ☐ | Oversight documentation (STD-AI-007) |
| Accuracy/robustness/security | YES | ☐ | Performance documentation (STD-AI-008) |
| Testing and validation | YES | ☐ | Test documentation (STD-AI-009) |
| Instructions for use | YES | ☐ | User documentation (STD-AI-006) |
Evidence Required:
- Complete technical documentation package
- Annex IV completeness checklist
- Review records
- Approval records
- Archive records
Audit Verification:
- Verify technical documentation prepared
- Confirm Annex IV completeness verified
- Check reviews conducted
- Validate approval obtained
Control CA-002: Compliance Verification
Control ID: CA-002
Control Name: EU AI Act Compliance Verification
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per conformity assessment
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Verify AI system compliance with all EU AI Act requirements to ensure system meets all regulatory obligations before market placement.
Control Requirements
CR-002.1: Comprehensive Compliance Verification
Verify compliance with all applicable EU AI Act requirements.
Compliance Checklist:
| Requirement | Article | Verification Method | Evidence Required | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk Management System | Article 9 | Review risk management documentation | Risk documentation (STD-AI-002) | ☐ |
| Data Governance | Article 10 | Review data quality and bias assessments | Data documentation (STD-AI-003) | ☐ |
| Technical Documentation | Article 11 | Verify Annex IV completeness | Technical documentation (STD-AI-004) | ☐ |
| Record-Keeping | Article 12 | Verify logging implementation | Logging documentation (STD-AI-005) | ☐ |
| Transparency | Article 13 | Review instructions for use | User documentation (STD-AI-006) | ☐ |
| Human Oversight | Article 14 | Verify oversight measures | Oversight documentation (STD-AI-007) | ☐ |
| Accuracy/Robustness/Security | Article 15 | Review test results | Performance documentation (STD-AI-008) | ☐ |
| Quality Management System | Article 17 | Verify QMS implementation | QMS documentation (STD-AI-009) | ☐ |
Mandatory Actions:
- Review all compliance evidence
- Verify each requirement met
- Document verification results
- Address any gaps
- Obtain compliance sign-off
- Block market placement if non-compliant
Gap Analysis and Remediation:
| Gap Type | Severity | Remediation Required | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missing documentation | High | Complete documentation | Before assessment |
| Non-compliance | Critical | Remediate non-compliance | Before market placement |
| Minor gaps | Medium | Document and plan remediation | Per remediation plan |
Evidence Required:
- Compliance Verification Checklist (CHK-AI-CA-001)
- Verification records
- Gap analysis (if applicable)
- Remediation records
- Compliance sign-off
Audit Verification:
- Verify compliance verification conducted
- Confirm all requirements checked
- Check gaps identified and addressed
- Validate compliance sign-off obtained
- Verify market placement blocked if non-compliant
Control CA-003: Conformity Assessment Report
Control ID: CA-003
Control Name: Annex VI Conformity Assessment Report
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per conformity assessment
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Prepare conformity assessment report documenting compliance for Annex VI internal control procedure to provide evidence of conformity assessment completion.
Control Requirements
CR-003.1: Conformity Assessment Report Preparation
Prepare comprehensive conformity assessment report.
Report Contents:
| Section | Content | Required |
|---|---|---|
| AI System Identification | Name, type, version, unique identifier | YES |
| Intended Purpose | Description of intended purpose | YES |
| Conformity Assessment Procedure | Annex VI (Internal Control) | YES |
| Technical Documentation Summary | Summary of technical documentation | YES |
| Compliance Verification Results | Results of compliance verification | YES |
| Test Results Summary | Summary of testing and validation | YES |
| Risk Management Summary | Summary of risk management | YES |
| Conclusion of Conformity | Statement of conformity | YES |
| Date and Signature | Date and authorized signature | YES |
Mandatory Actions:
- Compile assessment results
- Prepare conformity assessment report
- Review report for accuracy
- Obtain approval
- Archive report
- Maintain for 10 years
Evidence Required:
- Conformity Assessment Report (RPT-AI-CA-XXX)
- Supporting documentation
- Review records
- Approval records
- Archive records
Audit Verification:
- Verify conformity assessment report prepared
- Confirm all required sections included
- Check report reviewed and approved
- Validate report archived
Control CA-004: Notified Body Selection
Control ID: CA-004
Control Name: Notified Body Selection and Engagement
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per Annex VII assessment
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Select and engage qualified notified body for Annex VII conformity assessment to ensure competent third-party assessment for Annex I product safety AI systems.
Control Requirements
CR-004.1: Notified Body Selection Process
Select and engage qualified notified body.
Selection Criteria:
| Criterion | Description | Weight | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Designation | Designated for AI Act conformity assessment | Critical | Must be designated |
| Expertise | Expertise in relevant domain | High | Domain expertise required |
| Availability | Availability and timeline | Medium | Timeline acceptable |
| Cost | Assessment cost | Medium | Cost reasonable |
| Reputation | Reputation and track record | Medium | Good reputation |
Mandatory Actions:
- Identify candidate notified bodies
- Evaluate against criteria
- Select notified body
- Negotiate contract
- Engage notified body
- Document selection
Evidence Required:
- Notified body evaluation
- Selection justification
- Contract with notified body
- Engagement records
Audit Verification:
- Verify notified body selected
- Confirm notified body designated for AI Act
- Check contract executed
- Validate engagement documented
Control CA-005: QMS Assessment Preparation
Control ID: CA-005
Control Name: QMS Assessment Preparation for Annex VII
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per Annex VII assessment
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Prepare for notified body QMS assessment to ensure QMS is ready for third-party evaluation.
Control Requirements
CR-005.1: QMS Assessment Readiness
Ensure QMS fully implemented and ready for assessment.
Preparation Activities:
| Activity | Description | Required | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| QMS Implementation | Ensure QMS fully implemented | YES | QMS documentation (STD-AI-009) |
| Internal QMS Audit | Conduct internal QMS audit | YES | Internal audit report |
| Nonconformity Remediation | Address any nonconformities | YES | Remediation records |
| QMS Documentation | Prepare QMS documentation package | YES | QMS documentation package |
| Notified Body Briefing | Brief notified body on QMS | YES | Briefing records |
Mandatory Actions:
- Review QMS implementation
- Conduct pre-assessment audit
- Remediate findings
- Compile QMS documentation package
- Schedule notified body assessment
- Brief notified body
Evidence Required:
- QMS documentation package
- Internal audit report
- Remediation records
- Assessment schedule
- Briefing records
Audit Verification:
- Verify QMS fully implemented
- Confirm internal audit conducted
- Check findings remediated
- Validate documentation package prepared
Control CA-006: Technical Documentation Assessment Preparation
Control ID: CA-006
Control Name: Technical Documentation Preparation for Annex VII
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per Annex VII assessment
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Prepare technical documentation for notified body review to ensure complete and accurate documentation is available for Annex VII assessment.
Control Requirements
CR-006.1: Technical Documentation Readiness
Ensure technical documentation complete and ready for notified body review.
Preparation Activities:
| Activity | Description | Required | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation Completeness | Ensure technical documentation complete | YES | Technical documentation (STD-AI-004) |
| Internal Documentation Review | Conduct internal documentation review | YES | Internal review records |
| Gap Remediation | Address any gaps | YES | Gap remediation records |
| Documentation Package | Prepare documentation package | YES | Documentation package |
| Submission to Notified Body | Submit to notified body | YES | Submission records |
Mandatory Actions:
- Review technical documentation
- Verify completeness
- Address gaps
- Compile documentation package
- Submit to notified body
- Track submission
Evidence Required:
- Technical documentation package
- Internal review records
- Submission records
Audit Verification:
- Verify technical documentation complete
- Confirm internal review conducted
- Check gaps addressed
- Validate documentation submitted
Control CA-007: Notified Body Assessment Support
Control ID: CA-007
Control Name: Notified Body Assessment Support and Response
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per Annex VII assessment
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Support notified body during assessment and respond to findings to ensure successful Annex VII conformity assessment.
Control Requirements
CR-007.1: Notified Body Assessment Support
Support notified body during assessment process.
Assessment Process:
| Step | Description | Support Required |
|---|---|---|
| QMS Review | Notified body reviews QMS | Provide QMS documentation, answer questions |
| Technical Documentation Review | Notified body reviews technical documentation | Provide documentation, clarify questions |
| On-Site Assessment | Notified body may conduct on-site assessment | Facilitate on-site visit, provide access |
| Additional Information | Notified body may request additional information | Provide requested information promptly |
| Assessment Report | Notified body issues assessment report | Review report, respond to findings |
| Certificate | Notified body issues certificate (if compliant) | Obtain and archive certificate |
Mandatory Actions:
- Provide requested information
- Support on-site assessment
- Address notified body findings
- Obtain assessment report
- Obtain certificate (if compliant)
- Archive assessment records
Findings Response:
| Finding Type | Severity | Response Required | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Major Nonconformity | Critical | Immediate remediation | Before certificate |
| Minor Nonconformity | Medium | Remediation plan | Per plan |
| Observation | Low | Document and monitor | Ongoing |
Evidence Required:
- Notified body assessment report
- Findings and responses
- EU-type examination certificate (if applicable)
- Correspondence with notified body
- Archive records
Audit Verification:
- Verify notified body supported
- Confirm findings addressed
- Check certificate obtained (if compliant)
- Validate records archived
Control CA-008: EU Declaration of Conformity Preparation
Control ID: CA-008
Control Name: EU Declaration of Conformity Preparation
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per high-risk AI system, per substantial modification
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Prepare EU Declaration of Conformity with all required elements per Article 47 to provide formal declaration of compliance.
Control Requirements
CR-008.1: Declaration Preparation
Prepare EU Declaration of Conformity with all required elements.
Required Elements (Article 47(1)):
| Element | Content | Required | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI System Identification | Name, type, version | YES | Technical documentation |
| Provider Information | Name, address | YES | Company information |
| Declaration Statement | "This declaration of conformity is issued under the sole responsibility of the provider" | YES | Standard text |
| Object of Declaration | AI system description and intended purpose | YES | Technical documentation |
| Conformity Statement | "The object of the declaration described above is in conformity with Regulation (EU) 2024/1689" | YES | Standard text |
| Harmonized Standards | References to harmonized standards applied | If applicable | Standards documentation |
| Common Specifications | References (if no harmonized standards) | If applicable | Specifications documentation |
| Notified Body Details | Name, number, certificate number (if Annex VII) | If Annex VII | Notified body certificate |
| Additional Information | Any other relevant information | If applicable | As needed |
| Place and Date | Where and when issued | YES | Declaration location and date |
| Signature | Name and function of signatory | YES | Authorized signatory |
Mandatory Actions:
- Complete declaration template
- Verify all required elements included
- Review for accuracy
- Obtain legal review
- Obtain authorized signature
- Date declaration
Evidence Required:
- EU Declaration of Conformity (DOC-AI-CONFORM-XXX)
- Declaration template
- Review records
- Signature authorization
Audit Verification:
- Verify declaration prepared
- Confirm all required elements included
- Check legal review conducted
- Validate signature obtained
Control CA-009: EU Declaration of Conformity Review and Approval
Control ID: CA-009
Control Name: EU Declaration of Conformity Review and Approval
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per declaration
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Review and approve EU Declaration of Conformity before issuance to ensure accuracy, completeness, and legal compliance.
Control Requirements
CR-009.1: Declaration Review and Approval Process
Conduct comprehensive review and obtain approval.
Review Checklist:
| Check | Description | Required | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completeness | All required elements present | YES | ☐ |
| Accuracy | Information accurate and current | YES | ☐ |
| Consistency with Technical Documentation | Consistent with technical documentation | YES | ☐ |
| Consistency with Conformity Assessment | Consistent with conformity assessment | YES | ☐ |
| Legal Compliance | Legally compliant | YES | ☐ |
| Proper Signature | Properly signed | YES | ☐ |
Approval Authority:
- Legal review required
- Executive approval required (CEO or authorized delegate)
Mandatory Actions:
- Conduct legal review
- Verify accuracy
- Obtain executive approval
- Sign declaration
- Date declaration
- Archive declaration
Evidence Required:
- Review checklist
- Legal approval
- Executive approval
- Signed declaration
- Archive records
Audit Verification:
- Verify review conducted
- Confirm legal approval obtained
- Check executive approval obtained
- Validate declaration signed and dated
Control CA-010: EU Declaration of Conformity Availability
Control ID: CA-010
Control Name: EU Declaration of Conformity Retention and Availability
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Continuous, 10-year retention
Risk Level: Medium
Control Objective
Keep EU Declaration of Conformity available per Article 47(2) to ensure availability to competent authorities for 10 years.
Control Requirements
CR-010.1: Declaration Availability Management
Maintain declaration availability per regulatory requirements.
Availability Requirements:
| Requirement | Specification | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Retention Period | 10 years | Archive for 10 years |
| Language | Available in language(s) required by Member State(s) | Provide translations if needed |
| Authority Requests | Provided upon request | Respond promptly to requests |
| Updates | Kept up to date | Update when AI system changes |
Mandatory Actions:
- Store declaration securely
- Maintain for 10 years
- Provide translations if needed
- Update when AI system changes
- Respond to authority requests
- Document availability
Evidence Required:
- Declaration storage records
- Retention compliance
- Translation records (if applicable)
- Authority request responses
- Update records
Audit Verification:
- Verify declaration stored securely
- Confirm 10-year retention maintained
- Check translations provided (if needed)
- Validate authority requests responded to
Control CA-011: CE Marking Affixing
Control ID: CA-011
Control Name: CE Marking Affixing and Display
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per high-risk AI system
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Affix CE marking to high-risk AI system per Article 48 to indicate EU conformity.
Control Requirements
CR-011.1: CE Marking Affixing
Affix CE marking per Article 48 requirements.
CE Marking Requirements (Article 48(1)):
| Requirement | Specification | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility | Visible, legible, and indelible | Ensure proper display |
| Timing | Affixed before placing on market | Affix before market placement |
| Physical Products | Affixed to AI system or packaging | Affix to product/packaging |
| Software | Affixed to instructions for use | Include in instructions for use |
| Additional Markings | May be accompanied by pictogram or other marking | If applicable |
Mandatory Actions:
- Determine where to affix CE marking
- Design CE marking display
- Affix CE marking
- Verify visibility and legibility
- Document CE marking
- Verify before market placement
CE Marking Placement:
| AI System Type | Placement Location | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Product | Product or packaging | Visual inspection |
| Software | Instructions for use | Documentation review |
| Cloud Service | Instructions for use, website | Documentation review |
Evidence Required:
- CE marking placement documentation
- CE marking images
- Instructions for use with CE marking
- Verification records
Audit Verification:
- Verify CE marking affixed
- Confirm visibility and legibility
- Check placement appropriate
- Validate documented
Control CA-012: CE Marking Compliance
Control ID: CA-012
Control Name: CE Marking Rules Compliance
Control Type: Preventive
Control Frequency: Per CE marking
Risk Level: High
Control Objective
Ensure CE marking complies with all rules per Article 48(2-5) to maintain regulatory compliance.
Control Requirements
CR-012.1: CE Marking Rules Compliance
Ensure CE marking complies with all regulatory rules.
CE Marking Rules (Article 48(2-5)):
| Rule | Description | Compliance Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Conformity Indication | CE marking indicates conformity with EU AI Act | Only affix if compliant |
| Provider Responsibility | CE marking affixed under provider's responsibility | Ensure provider responsibility clear |
| Non-Compliant Systems | CE marking not affixed if AI system not compliant | Verify compliance before affixing |
| Other Markings | Other markings allowed if not confused with CE marking | Avoid confusing markings |
| Authority Evidence | National authorities may request evidence of conformity | Prepare evidence package |
Mandatory Actions:
- Verify conformity before affixing CE marking
- Ensure provider responsibility clear
- Avoid confusing markings
- Prepare evidence for authorities
- Monitor CE marking compliance
Evidence Required:
- Conformity verification
- CE marking authorization
- Evidence package for authorities
Audit Verification:
- Verify conformity verified before affixing
- Confirm provider responsibility clear
- Check no confusing markings
- Validate evidence package prepared
Control CA-013: Conformity Assessment Maintenance
Control ID: CA-013
Control Name: Ongoing Conformity Maintenance and Monitoring
Control Type: Detective
Control Frequency: Continuous
Risk Level: Medium
Control Objective
Maintain conformity throughout AI system lifecycle and reassess when substantial modifications occur to ensure ongoing compliance.
Control Requirements
CR-013.1: Ongoing Compliance Monitoring
Monitor ongoing compliance with EU AI Act requirements.
Monitoring Activities:
| Activity | Description | Frequency | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substantial Modification Monitoring | Monitor for substantial modifications | Continuous | Modification tracking |
| Regulatory Change Monitoring | Monitor regulatory changes | Quarterly | Regulatory update log |
| Conformity Assessment Validity | Monitor conformity assessment validity | Annually | Validity tracking |
| Certificate Validity | Monitor certificate validity (if Annex VII) | Annually | Certificate tracking |
| CE Marking Integrity | Monitor CE marking integrity | Annually | CE marking verification |
Mandatory Actions:
- Establish compliance monitoring process
- Track modifications
- Track regulatory updates
- Verify certificate validity
- Verify CE marking
- Report compliance status
CR-013.2: Substantial Modification Assessment
Reassess conformity when substantial modifications occur.
Substantial Modification Triggers:
| Trigger | Description | Assessment Required |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance Impact | Change affecting compliance | YES |
| Intended Purpose Change | Change to intended purpose | YES |
| Risk Profile Change | Change to risk profile | YES |
| Technical Specification Change | Change to technical specifications | YES |
| Regulatory Interpretation | Regulatory interpretation changes | YES |
Mandatory Actions:
- Assess if modification is substantial
- If substantial, initiate new conformity assessment
- Update technical documentation
- Update EU Declaration of Conformity
- Update CE marking if needed
- Document modification assessment
Evidence Required:
- Compliance monitoring records
- Modification tracking
- Regulatory update log
- Certificate validity tracking
- Modification assessment records
- New conformity assessment (if needed)
- Updated documentation
Audit Verification:
- Verify compliance monitoring established
- Confirm modifications tracked
- Check substantial modifications reassessed
- Validate documentation updated
SUPPORTING PROCEDURES
This standard is implemented through the following detailed procedures:
Procedure PROC-AI-CA-001: Conformity Assessment Planning Procedure
Purpose: Define step-by-step process for planning conformity assessment
Owner: Chief Legal Officer
Implements: Controls CA-001, CA-002, CA-003, CA-004
Procedure Steps:
- Determine conformity assessment procedure (Annex VI or VII)
- Prepare technical documentation - Control CA-001
- Verify compliance - Control CA-002
- Prepare conformity assessment report (Annex VI) - Control CA-003
- Select notified body (Annex VII) - Control CA-004
Outputs:
- Conformity assessment plan
- Technical documentation
- Compliance verification
- Conformity assessment report (Annex VI)
- Notified body selection (Annex VII)
Procedure PROC-AI-CA-002: Internal Control Procedure (Annex VI)
Purpose: Define process for Annex VI internal control assessment
Owner: Chief Legal Officer
Implements: Controls CA-001, CA-002, CA-003
Procedure Steps:
- Prepare technical documentation - Control CA-001
- Verify compliance - Control CA-002
- Prepare conformity assessment report - Control CA-003
- Obtain approval
- Archive records
Outputs:
- Technical documentation
- Compliance verification
- Conformity assessment report
Procedure PROC-AI-CA-003: EU Declaration of Conformity Procedure
Purpose: Define process for preparing and issuing EU Declaration of Conformity
Owner: Chief Legal Officer
Implements: Controls CA-008, CA-009, CA-010
Procedure Steps:
- Prepare declaration - Control CA-008
- Review and approve - Control CA-009
- Sign and date
- Archive declaration - Control CA-010
- Maintain availability
Outputs:
- EU Declaration of Conformity
- Review records
- Approval records
- Archive records
COMPLIANCE
5.1 Compliance Monitoring
Monitoring Approach: Continuous automated monitoring supplemented by monthly manual reviews and quarterly comprehensive audits.
Compliance Metrics:
| Metric | Target | Measurement Method | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conformity Assessment Completion | 100% | % of high-risk AI assessed before market placement | Monthly | Chief Legal Officer |
| EU Declaration of Conformity Coverage | 100% | % of high-risk AI with declaration | Monthly | Chief Legal Officer |
| CE Marking Compliance | 100% | % of high-risk AI with proper CE marking | Monthly | Chief Legal Officer |
| Assessment Timeliness | < 90 days | Average days to complete assessment | Per assessment | Chief Legal Officer |
| Substantial Modification Reassessment | 100% | % of substantial modifications reassessed | Monthly | Chief Legal Officer |
| Notified Body Findings | 0 major | # of major findings from notified body | Per assessment | Chief Legal Officer |
Monitoring Tools:
- Conformity Assessment Dashboard
- Compliance Reports
- Monthly compliance reports
- Quarterly AI Governance Committee reviews
5.2 Internal Audit Requirements
Audit Frequency: Annually (minimum)
Audit Scope:
- Conformity assessment completion
- Technical documentation completeness
- Compliance verification quality
- EU Declaration of Conformity accuracy
- CE marking compliance
- Conformity maintenance
- Controls effectiveness (CA-001 through CA-013)
Audit Activities:
- Review 100% of high-risk AI for conformity assessment
- Sample 20% of conformity assessments for quality review
- Test compliance verification process
- Review EU Declarations of Conformity
- Test CE marking compliance
- Review conformity maintenance
Audit Outputs:
- Annual Conformity Assessment Audit Report
- Findings and recommendations
- Corrective action plans for deficiencies
5.3 External Audit / Regulatory Inspection
Preparation:
- Maintain audit-ready conformity assessment documentation at all times
- Designate Chief Legal Officer and Legal as regulatory liaisons
- Prepare standard response procedures for authority requests
Provide to Auditors/Regulators:
- Conformity assessment reports
- Technical documentation
- EU Declarations of Conformity
- CE marking documentation
- Notified body certificates (if applicable)
- Internal audit reports
- Evidence of controls execution
Authority Request Response:
- Acknowledge request within 1 business day
- Provide requested documentation within 5 business days
- Coordinate through Legal and Chief Legal Officer
- Document all interactions with authorities
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
6.1 RACI Matrix
| Activity | Chief Legal Officer | AI Act Program Manager | AI System Owner | Quality Director | CTO | Executive Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conformity Assessment Planning | R/A | R | C | I | C | I |
| Technical Documentation Preparation | R | C | A | I | R | I |
| Compliance Verification | R/A | R | C | C | C | I |
| Conformity Assessment Report | R | R | C | I | C | I |
| Notified Body Selection | R/A | R | I | I | I | I |
| QMS Assessment Preparation | R | C | I | R/A | I | I |
| EU Declaration Preparation | R/A | R | C | I | I | I |
| EU Declaration Approval | R | C | I | I | I | A |
| CE Marking | R | R | A | I | I | I |
| Conformity Maintenance | R/A | R | A | I | I | I |
RACI Legend:
- R = Responsible (does the work)
- A = Accountable (ultimately answerable)
- C = Consulted (provides input)
- I = Informed (kept up-to-date)
6.2 Role Descriptions
Chief Legal Officer
- Primary Responsibility: Owns conformity assessment framework, ensures compliance
- Key Activities:
- Oversees conformity assessment process
- Ensures regulatory compliance
- Approves EU Declarations of Conformity
- Reports to management
- Required Competencies: EU AI Act Article 43-48, conformity assessment, regulatory compliance
AI Act Program Manager
- Primary Responsibility: Manages conformity assessment process
- Key Activities:
- Coordinates conformity assessments
- Manages assessment timelines
- Tracks compliance status
- Reports metrics
- Required Competencies: Conformity assessment procedures, project management
AI System Owner
- Primary Responsibility: Accountable for conformity of their AI system
- Key Activities:
- Provides technical information
- Supports assessment
- Ensures CE marking affixed
- Monitors for modifications
- Required Competencies: AI system knowledge, conformity assessment awareness
Quality Director
- Primary Responsibility: Ensures QMS ready for Annex VII assessment
- Key Activities:
- Prepares QMS for assessment
- Supports notified body assessment
- Required Competencies: QMS management, Annex VII requirements
CTO
- Primary Responsibility: Ensures technical documentation ready
- Key Activities:
- Prepares technical documentation
- Supports assessment
- Required Competencies: Technical documentation, Annex IV requirements
Executive Management
- Primary Responsibility: Signs EU Declaration of Conformity
- Key Activities:
- Reviews and approves declarations
- Signs declarations
- Required Competencies: Executive authority, regulatory awareness
EXCEPTIONS
7.1 Exception Philosophy
Conformity assessment is a mandatory regulatory requirement for high-risk AI systems before market placement. Exceptions are granted restrictively and only where compensating controls adequately mitigate risks.
7.2 Allowed Exceptions
The following exceptions may be granted with proper justification and approval:
| Exception Type | Justification Required | Maximum Duration | Approval Authority | Compensating Controls |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended Assessment Timeline | Resource constraints prevent timely assessment | 30 days | Chief Legal Officer + AI Governance Committee | Interim compliance measures; Accelerated plan |
7.3 Prohibited Exceptions
The following exceptions cannot be granted under any circumstances:
❌ Skipping conformity assessment for high-risk AI - Mandatory per Article 43, no exceptions
❌ Placing high-risk AI on market without assessment - Illegal, no exceptions
❌ Skipping EU Declaration of Conformity - Mandatory per Article 47, no exceptions
❌ Skipping CE marking - Mandatory per Article 48, no exceptions
❌ Skipping substantial modification reassessment - Required for ongoing compliance
7.4 Exception Request Process
Step 1: Submit Exception Request
- Complete Exception Request Form (FORM-AI-EXCEPTION-001)
- Include business justification
- Propose compensating controls
- Specify duration requested
- Attach risk assessment
Step 2: Risk Assessment
- Chief Legal Officer assesses risk of granting exception
- Evaluates adequacy of compensating controls
- Documents residual risk
Step 3: Approval
- Route to appropriate approval authority based on exception type
- Chief Legal Officer approval: Minor exceptions
- Chief Legal Officer + AI Governance Committee: Significant exceptions
- AI Governance Committee: Critical exceptions
Step 4: Documentation and Monitoring
- Document exception in Exception Register
- Assign exception owner
- Set review date
- Monitor compensating controls
- Report exceptions quarterly to AI Governance Committee
Step 5: Exception Review and Closure
- Review exception at specified review date
- Assess if exception still needed
- Close exception when normal assessment completed
- Document lessons learned
ENFORCEMENT
8.1 Non-Compliance Consequences
| Violation | Severity | Consequence | Remediation Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placing high-risk AI on market without assessment | Critical | Immediate removal from market; Legal investigation | Complete assessment immediately; Root cause analysis |
| Missing EU Declaration of Conformity | Critical | Immediate suspension; Compliance gap assessment | Prepare declaration within 5 business days |
| Missing CE marking | Critical | Immediate correction; Compliance gap assessment | Affix CE marking within 5 business days |
| Incomplete conformity assessment | High | Escalation to AI Governance Committee | Complete assessment within 10 business days |
| Substantial modification not reassessed | High | Escalation to management | Reassess within 10 business days |
8.2 Escalation Procedures
Level 1: Chief Legal Officer
- Minor procedural violations
- Documentation deficiencies
- Timeline delays < 5 days
- Action: Written warning, corrective action required
Level 2: Chief Legal Officer + AI Governance Committee
- Repeated violations
- Incomplete assessments
- Missing declarations
- Action: Formal review, corrective action plan, management notification
Level 3: AI Governance Committee
- Placing AI on market without assessment
- Missing CE marking
- Critical compliance failures
- Action: Immediate market removal, investigation, disciplinary action
Level 4: Executive Management + Legal
- Potential regulatory enforcement action
- Significant legal liability
- Reputational risk
- Action: Executive crisis management, legal strategy, regulatory engagement
8.3 Immediate Escalation Triggers
Escalate immediately to AI Governance Committee + Legal if:
- ⚠️ High-risk AI system placed on market without conformity assessment
- ⚠️ Missing EU Declaration of Conformity
- ⚠️ Missing CE marking
- ⚠️ Regulatory inquiry or inspection related to conformity assessment
- ⚠️ Notified body finding of major nonconformity
8.4 Disciplinary Actions
Individuals responsible for conformity assessment violations may be subject to:
- Verbal or written warning
- Mandatory retraining
- Performance improvement plan
- Reassignment of responsibilities
- Suspension (with pay during investigation)
- Termination (for egregious violations, e.g., knowingly placing AI on market without assessment)
Factors Considered:
- Intent (knowing violation vs. honest mistake)
- Severity of violation
- Impact (actual or potential)
- Cooperation with remediation
- Prior violation history
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs)
9.1 Conformity Assessment KPIs
| KPI ID | KPI Name | Definition | Target | Measurement Method | Frequency | Owner | Reporting To |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPI-CA-001 | Conformity Assessment Completion | % of high-risk AI assessed before market placement | 100% | (# assessed / # high-risk AI) × 100 | Per system | Chief Legal Officer | AI Governance Committee |
| KPI-CA-002 | EU Declaration of Conformity Coverage | % of high-risk AI with declaration | 100% | (# with declaration / # high-risk AI) × 100 | Monthly | Chief Legal Officer | Management |
| KPI-CA-003 | CE Marking Compliance | % of high-risk AI with proper CE marking | 100% | (# with CE marking / # high-risk AI) × 100 | Monthly | Chief Legal Officer | Management |
| KPI-CA-004 | Assessment Timeliness | Average days to complete assessment | < 90 days | Σ (assessment days) / # assessments | Per assessment | Chief Legal Officer | Management |
| KPI-CA-005 | Substantial Modification Reassessment | % of substantial modifications reassessed | 100% | (# reassessed / # substantial modifications) × 100 | Monthly | Chief Legal Officer | AI Governance Committee |
| KPI-CA-006 | Notified Body Findings | Number of major findings from notified body | 0 | Count of major findings | Per assessment | Chief Legal Officer | AI Governance Committee |
| KPI-CA-007 | Declaration Accuracy | % of declarations with no errors | 100% | (# error-free / # total declarations) × 100 | Per declaration | Chief Legal Officer | Management |
| KPI-CA-008 | Technical Documentation Completeness | % of assessments with complete documentation | 100% | (# complete / # assessments) × 100 | Per assessment | Chief Legal Officer | Management |
9.2 KPI Dashboards and Reporting
Real-Time Dashboard (Chief Legal Officer access)
- Current conformity assessment status
- Declaration status
- CE marking status
- Assessment timelines
- Compliance status
Monthly Management Report
- KPI-CA-001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 007, 008
- Trend analysis (vs. previous month)
- Issues and risks
- Planned actions
Quarterly AI Governance Committee Report
- All KPIs
- Conformity assessment effectiveness assessment
- Notified body findings review
- Internal audit findings (if conducted)
- Exception register review
Annual Executive Report
- Full-year KPI performance
- Conformity assessment maturity assessment
- Strategic recommendations
- Regulatory outlook
9.3 KPI Thresholds and Alerts
| KPI | Green (Good) | Yellow (Warning) | Red (Critical) | Alert Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conformity Assessment Completion | 100% | 95-99% | < 95% | Red: Immediate escalation to AI Governance Committee Chair |
| EU Declaration of Conformity Coverage | 100% | 95-99% | < 95% | Red: Immediate escalation to AI Governance Committee |
| CE Marking Compliance | 100% | 95-99% | < 95% | Red: Immediate escalation to AI Governance Committee |
| Assessment Timeliness | < 90 days | 90-120 days | > 120 days | Red: Escalate to AI Governance Committee |
| Notified Body Findings | 0 | 1-2 | > 2 | Red: Immediate escalation to AI Governance Committee |
TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
10.1 Training Program Overview
All personnel involved in conformity assessment must complete role-specific training to ensure competency in EU AI Act Article 43-48 requirements, conformity assessment procedures, and regulatory compliance.
10.2 Role-Based Training Requirements
| Role | Training Course | Duration | Content | Frequency | Assessment Required |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Legal Officer | Conformity Assessment Expert Training | 20 hours | EU AI Act Article 43-48; Annex VI/VII; Declaration; CE marking | Initial + annually | Yes - Written exam (≥90%) |
| AI Act Program Manager | Conformity Assessment Management Training | 16 hours | Conformity assessment procedures; Planning; Coordination | Initial + annually | Yes - Written exam (≥90%) |
| Legal Staff | Conformity Assessment Legal Training | 12 hours | Legal requirements; Declaration; Compliance | Initial + annually | Yes - Written exam (≥90%) |
| AI System Owners | Conformity Assessment Overview | 4 hours | Conformity assessment requirements; Responsibilities; Support | At onboarding + annually | Yes - Knowledge check (≥80%) |
| All AI Development Staff | Conformity Assessment Awareness | 2 hours | Conformity assessment basics; Requirements; Awareness | At onboarding + annually | Yes - Knowledge check (≥80%) |
10.3 Training Content by Topic
EU AI Act Article 43-48 Requirements
- Conformity assessment (Article 43)
- Certificates (Article 44)
- EU Declaration of Conformity (Article 47)
- CE marking (Article 48)
- Compliance obligations
Annex VI - Internal Control
- Self-assessment procedure
- Technical documentation requirements
- Compliance verification
- Conformity assessment report
Annex VII - QMS + Technical Documentation
- Notified body assessment
- QMS assessment preparation
- Technical documentation assessment
- Certificate process
EU Declaration of Conformity
- Declaration requirements
- Declaration preparation
- Declaration review and approval
- Declaration availability
CE Marking
- CE marking requirements
- CE marking affixing
- CE marking rules
- CE marking compliance
10.4 Training Delivery Methods
Initial Training:
- Instructor-led classroom or virtual training
- Includes interactive exercises and case studies
- Hands-on practice with declaration templates
- Group discussions of complex scenarios
Annual Refresher:
- E-learning modules for core content review
- Live update sessions for regulatory changes
- Case study reviews of recent conformity assessments
- Knowledge assessment
On-the-Job Training:
- Mentoring for new conformity assessment staff
- Job shadowing during conformity assessments
- Supervised conformity assessment for first 3 AI systems
Just-in-Time Training:
- Quick reference guides and job aids
- Video tutorials on specific topics
- Help desk support from experienced staff
10.5 Training Effectiveness Measurement
Assessment Methods:
- Written exams for knowledge retention
- Practical exercises for skill application
- On-the-job observations for competency validation
- Feedback surveys for training quality
Competency Validation:
- Chief Legal Officers: Must demonstrate ability to conduct conformity assessment for 1 sample AI system with 100% compliance before independent work
- All staff: Must pass knowledge assessments with minimum required scores
Training Metrics:
| Metric | Target | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Training completion rate | 100% | Quarterly |
| Assessment pass rate (first attempt) | ≥ 90% | Per training |
| Training effectiveness score (survey) | ≥ 4.0/5.0 | Per training |
| Time to competency (Chief Legal Officers) | < 45 days | Per person |
10.6 Training Records
Records Maintained:
- Training attendance records
- Assessment scores
- Competency validations
- Refresher training completion
- Individual training transcripts
Retention: 10 years (to align with EU AI Act documentation retention)
Access: HR, Chief Legal Officer, Internal Audit, Competent Authorities (upon request)
DEFINITIONS
| Term | Definition | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Conformity Assessment | Process demonstrating AI system meets EU AI Act requirements | EU AI Act Article 43 |
| Internal Control | Self-assessment procedure (Annex VI) | EU AI Act Annex VI |
| Notified Body | Third-party organization designated to conduct conformity assessments | EU AI Act Article 44 |
| EU Declaration of Conformity | Document declaring AI system compliance | EU AI Act Article 47 |
| CE Marking | Marking indicating EU conformity | EU AI Act Article 48 |
| Substantial Modification | Change affecting compliance or intended purpose | EU AI Act Article 43 |
| Annex III High-Risk AI | AI systems listed in Annex III as high-risk | EU AI Act Annex III |
| Annex I Product Safety AI | AI systems that are safety components of products listed in Annex I | EU AI Act Annex I |
| EU-Type Examination Certificate | Certificate issued by notified body (Annex VII) | EU AI Act Article 44 |
LINK WITH AI ACT AND ISO42001
12.1 EU AI Act Regulatory Mapping
This standard implements the following EU AI Act requirements:
| EU AI Act Provision | Article | Requirement Summary | Implemented By (Controls) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conformity Assessment | Article 43 | Conformity assessment before market placement | All controls (CA-001 through CA-013) |
| Annex VI - Internal Control | Annex VI | Self-assessment procedure | CA-001, CA-002, CA-003 |
| Annex VII - QMS + Technical Documentation | Annex VII | Notified body assessment | CA-004, CA-005, CA-006, CA-007 |
| EU Declaration of Conformity | Article 47 | Declaration requirements | CA-008, CA-009, CA-010 |
| CE Marking | Article 48 | CE marking requirements | CA-011, CA-012 |
| Conformity Maintenance | Article 43 | Ongoing conformity maintenance | CA-013 |
12.2 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Alignment
This standard aligns with ISO/IEC 42001:2023 as follows:
| ISO 42001 Clause | Requirement | Implementation in This Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Clause 4.4: AI management system | Establish AI management system | Conformity assessment verifies QMS |
| Clause 9.2: Internal audit | Conduct internal audits | Internal audits support conformity assessment |
| Clause 9.3: Management review | Conduct management reviews | Management review supports conformity |
12.3 Relationship to Other Standards
This conformity assessment standard integrates with other AI Act standards:
| Related Standard | Integration Point | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| STD-AI-001: Classification | Classification determines if conformity assessment required | High-risk AI requires conformity assessment |
| STD-AI-002: Risk Management | Risk management evidence in conformity assessment | Conformity assessment verifies risk management |
| STD-AI-003: Data Governance | Data governance evidence in conformity assessment | Conformity assessment verifies data governance |
| STD-AI-004: Technical Documentation | Technical documentation required for conformity assessment | Technical documentation is conformity assessment input |
| STD-AI-009: Quality Management | QMS required for Annex VII assessment | QMS is Annex VII assessment component |
12.4 References and Related Documents
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689):
- Article 43: Conformity Assessment
- Article 44: Certificates
- Article 47: EU Declaration of Conformity
- Article 48: CE Marking
- Annex VI: Internal Control Procedure
- Annex VII: Assessment Based on Quality Management System and Technical Documentation Assessment
ISO/IEC Standards:
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system
Internal Documents:
- POL-AI-001: Artificial Intelligence Policy (parent policy)
- STD-AI-001: AI System Classification Standard
- STD-AI-002: AI Risk Management Standard
- STD-AI-003: AI Data Governance Standard
- STD-AI-004: AI Technical Documentation Standard
- STD-AI-009: AI Quality Management Standard
- PROC-AI-CA-001, -002, -003: Conformity assessment procedures
APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION
| Role | Name | Title | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prepared By | Michael Brown | Chief Legal Officer | _________________ | ________ |
| Reviewed By | Sarah Johnson | AI Act Program Manager | _________________ | ________ |
| Reviewed By | David Lee | Chief Technology Officer | _________________ | ________ |
| Reviewed By | Jane Doe | Chief Strategy & Risk Officer | _________________ | ________ |
| Approved By | Jane Doe | AI Governance Committee Chair | _________________ | ________ |
Effective Date: 2025-08-01
Next Review Date: 2026-08-01
Review Frequency: Annually or upon regulatory change
END OF STANDARD STD-AI-010
This standard is a living document. Feedback and improvement suggestions should be directed to the Chief Legal Officer.
Standard ID
STD-AI-010
Version
1.0
Status
draftOwner
Legal
Effective Date
2025-08-01
Applicability
High-risk AI systems